Showalter Group Blog Header

Start With the Proper Foundation

The way to develop a true program is to develop the proper foundation and program culture. Too often, public affairs professionals approach grassroots with a “top down” methodology. Our program design services incorporate fact-finding with the people who will most impact your success – your employees or members and senior organization leaders.

We talk with real employees and association members to determine what they want from the program, and arrange the key elements of your grassroots program accordingly. This results in greater member ownership, participation, involvement, and impact, which ultimately determines your ability to effect change in the legislative process.

The organizations with an ongoing, organized grassroots program will always have an edge over those without one. We have compared the results and know the investment saves time, resources, and will help you win your legislative battles.

Originality and Your Brand

Amyism #37
The Grassroots/PAC Brand: “Just like any company is known by the quality of its customers, so too is a government relations department known by the quality of its grassroots or PAC customers. Potential PAC and grassroots members are attracted to reliable, successful brands. If you aren’t happy with the quality of your customers, you need to alter your brand.”

I came up with that Amyism years ago. About five years ago, in fact, and it still rings true today. All advocacy groups and PAC’s are in a competition. Your interest group, association, or corporation is in a competition for the involvement and emotional allegiance of your stakeholders and outside audiences. While true allegiance is a long-term process, you need to get the attention of your prospects to even have a fighting chance for their attention.

As Sam Horn, The Intrigue Expert and our keynote speaker at Innovate to Motivate® said, “People are busy and bored. You have to capture their attention by being purposeful, original and pithy.”

One way to be original is to provide exclusive information to our grassroots and PAC volunteers. For example, because I have seen it come up with my own client research, and reiterated in Dr. Frank Luntz’s book, Words That Work, I urge clients to refrain from extensive use of the ubiquitous patriotic quotes and cliches in their PAC pitches. I simply have not seen patriotism rise to the top (or even be mentioned) as one of the reasons people give to a PAC, and that is consistent throughout a variety of industries and professions.

But what do many PAC professionals do? You got it – they use the stirring patriotic quotes over and over, because those quotes motivate them. The problem is, it’s not about them, and it’s about their audience! When you start thinking about what matters to your audience. And, if you don’t know, do some solid research, and rigorously implement the findings.

Yahoo: “Despite Enormous Popularity, Old Spice Guy Not Helping Sales”

The Old Spice ads make me laugh. They generate buzz. But it’s always about the results! Good to remember for your next PAC or grassroots campaign. Who is your target audience? Are you speaking their language?

Here’s the Yahoo story.

Frequently Asked Grassroots Questions

Through the last decade of leading a highly esteemed grassroots program, I have fielded many questions and concerns regarding grassroots programs. Here are the most frequently asked questions.

1. How often should we ask our members/ employees to contact their legislators?

The scientific answer is “it depends!” I used to believe there was a strict limit on the number of “Action Calls” one could implement. Always being smarter than I was two weeks ago, I’ve come to realize that the organizational and legislative environment dictates this.

Be suspect of the motives of any “expert” who cites an exact number. It just doesn’t pass the eye roll test.

While we all know that unexpected legislative dilemmas will arise, you and your lobbyist should prioritize issues which may result in calls to action and start persuading your stakeholders that these issues merit their support.

2. What is considered an acceptable response to a grassroots mobilization?

The answer to this perennial question varies depending on the following factors: how many times your grassroots network has been asked to contact their lawmakers on the issue; the evolution of your grassroots program; and, the bottom line impact to the organization and its members.

If you have an established program, or if your troops have read or heard about a certain issue for more than a year, a higher response should prevail. However, no amount of repetitive pleas will overcome information presented devoid of compelling, influential rationale.

3. What about the “rogue” employees/members? How can we prevent them from hurting our cause?

A favorite lament of grassroots practitioners, especially lobbyists, is that there are “rogue” employees/members in the ranks and they simply cannot be trusted to carry your organization’s message. This is correct – they can’t be trusted if you don’t train them on what to say and how to say it. Grassroots training and careful recruitment will ameliorate this dilemma.

4. We have a mandate from our CEO to start a grassroots program. How do we facilitate buy-in among our middle-management personnel?

Make it easy for your CEO to tout the importance of the grassroots program to the middle managers. For example, write remarks for him when he is addressing department meetings. Give the CEO (in writing) anecdotes about the grassroots program’s success. You should also write notes for the CEO to send to middle managers, thanking them for supporting their employee’s participation in the grassroots program.

Your CEO can’t read your mind – make it easy for him or her to help you.

5. What’s an appropriate budget for a grassroots program?

I’m positively amazed at the lack of focus on outcomes when budget decisions are made. Conduct a survey of your potential members and determine their level of current political activity, as well as their knowledge of issues that impact your industry. Then you can determine how much money you need for communications and events to increase involvement and awareness.

6. Which type of program is most effective – broad-based or Key Contact?

Both can be effective as long as the program is imbued with persuasive grassroots advocate communications, training, and a dynamic grassroots leader.

Your organization’s legislative goals, the legislative context, and whether you have short or long term goals should be the deciding factors.

7. How often should we communicate to our grassroots participants?

Corporate employees are inundated with hundreds of messages a day. Thus, you must prioritize your important issues.

However, I believe it’s very important to communicate with people three or four times on a particular issue before you ask them to take action on that issue. If you don’t, you shouldn’t expect much success on your calls to action. Again, you have to prioritize your issues.

8. What is the advantage to a membership-based corporate grassroots program versus one which attempts to engage all employees?

Since most progressive companies and associations are now engaged in grassroots efforts, it’s important to demonstrate the credibility and authenticity of your program. One way to accomplish this is to establish a “membership” program where employees or members sign up to receive legislative information. I know of legislators who, awash in letters from corporate employees, have publicly accused companies of -“brainwashing” their employees – not a desired public relations outcome.

Certain lawmakers may view legislative communications to all employees as corporate “brainwashing.” A membership program greatly reduces this perception. It’s simply more authentic than repetitive grassroots pleas to all employees when there is a crisis.

9. How should we “announce” the grassroots program to our members/employees?

You have to go to them. Take your show on the road with key organization leaders and respected co- workers. You must also brand the program with your own logo, mission statement, etc. The Liberty Bell was created as a symbol, or “brand” for the Revolutionary War. Not a bad grassroots example to emulate!

Tips for Managing the Rogue Grassroots Advocate

I hear the lament every time I speak before a group of government relations professionals, specifically lobbyists: “What happens if we ask our grassroots to contact their legislators and they say the wrong thing?” or, the ever-popular, “How can we trust them to say the right thing?” It is sometimes used by the unenlightened government relations professional as an excuse for not engaging in grassroots activity. No matter what the rationale, it’s a spurious reason to ignore your grassroots potential.

While about one percent or less of grassroots volunteers have an agenda opposite of the larger organizational cause, I truly believe that the rogue advocate does not act intentionally, rather, he or she simply doesn’t “know better.” When people know better, they do better. It’s our job to help them know and do better.

What’s good about these people? They are direct, assertive, and comfortable speaking their mind. These are great qualities, which, when properly channeled, can be an asset to your organization. Every advocacy group has had or will have an experience with rogues. Our challenge is to positively engage them in activity that will mitigate, and even eliminate, their unfruitful words and deeds.

I find that when this challenge occurs repeatedly in an organization, especially with Key Contacts, the staff has not done a proper job of recruiting, orientating, and training their Key Contacts. One effective way to ameliorate this is to ask the right questions before you bring someone on as a Key Contact.

“Interview” Potential Key Contacts

It is a regular practice in most non-profit social service volunteer organizations to conduct volunteer interviews to determine volunteer strengths, goals, etc. I’m still amazed that many association and corporate grassroots professionals don’t do the same thing.

Interviewing potential Key Contacts over the phone or in person will help you spot any ‘’red flags” that could negatively impact your organization. You have to explain the organization’s expectations for Key Contacts, and your success metrics. Volunteer research shows that the most productive and satisfied volunteers are ones who are properly trained, oriented to the expectations of the organization, and doing what they do best for the organization. It’s no different with grassroots advocates.

Develop Your Troops

Most organizations have some type of written guidelines for appropriate legislative communications, whether a manual, a “Do’s and Don’ts” brochure, etc. But we still have rogues running around. Why? Part of the reason is that we rely only on those good written resources to carry the message. They are essential, but you have to be with these folks in person to align their objectives with organizational goals. The most influential communications take place face-to-face. That’s what we tell our grassroots activists to do with lawmakers, so we should be willing to do the same thing with them.

Urge all of your new and seasoned Key Contacts to attend training. It doesn’t end there, however. Be proactive at the training. During training breaks or at lunch, ask your potential rogues if they have questions or don’t understand certain legislative communications “rules.”

If you have properly interviewed, trained, and provided role descriptions to your Key Contacts and are still having difficulties with them, here are my recommendations:

Don’t Ignore Them

I have always espoused that we shouldn’t spend too much time with our poor performers. Doing so can send a negative message to our stars. However, particularly if the loose cannon is a Board member or otherwise active and influential volunteer, you can’t ignore the situation. Too many times we discredit their behavior and complaints because of one infraction. However, if we don’t directly address the inappropriate behavior, we can’t expect it to change.

Ask For Their Input

Too often, we ask for help from our grassroots activists without asking them how we can help them.

A brief phone call to ask, “How are we doing?” “What are our next steps?” and “How can we make your activity with us more productive?” can be very increase rapport & cooperation.

Focus on their comments that may reveal any frustration about your goals or policies. These conversations can alert you to potential trouble spots. Further, this is a relationship-building effort that will pay off in the future.

The Value of Criticism

It’s not easy to criticize a volunteer, but it is vital to dealing with the rogue. So, let’s call it “offering a critique.” The rogue can be assisted by offering a critique when we observe or learn of the negative behavior.

The minute you observe or hear about a grassroots loose cannon who carried the wrong message, or behaved inappropriately with lawmakers or community leaders, you have to directly address it in a timely fashion. By timely, I mean within 24 hours.

As with positive feedback, it must be delivered quickly and with certainty.

Cite observed behavior, not rumors. Point out any positive observations as well.

Appraise and Reward

You should have some type of evaluation or appraisal mechanism in place to recognize your stellar performers. This mechanism sets an example for all Key Contacts and grassroots volunteers by demonstrating what the organization values. People have to know what stellar performance looks like.

Reward and recognition is more than annual luncheons and plaques. It’s the time you take each day to “catch someone doing something right.” You’ve got to pay attention and seek out the positive behaviors and results.

Don’t Expect Perfection

I am aware that a good advocate on a bad day can negatively impact your organization’s reputation and hamper your lobbying efforts. However, don’t expect them to communicate like you do. You are a professional, they are volunteers. Maybe they don’t use the exact lexicon you do when articulating an issue. Don’t sweat it. You don’t want the human version of form letters meeting with lawmakers anyway.

The Open Door Policy

Encourage your volunteers, the good and the average ones, to come to you with ideas or frustrations. If your rogue knows they can speak to you freely, chances are they will share concerns with you before anyone else.

When to Cut the Cord

I always advocate spending more time on your grassroots stars than your under achievers. Thus, you should not hesitate to disengage (translation, “fire”) a Key Contact when necessary.

When is it time? It’s time when they still engage in inappropriate activities after they have attended a training session, and after you have offered a direct, specific and timely critique. Two strikes and they’re out.

Relax

You aren’t the only one with this dilemma. It’s a grassroots fact of life. While we can’t totally eliminate the possibility of errant legislator communications, if you employ the above tactics, you’ll have fewer loose cannons in your grassroots arsenal.

Subscribe by Email

Categories

Archives