<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title> &#187; freedom of speech</title>
	<atom:link href="http://showaltergroup.com/blog/tag/freedom-of-speech/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://showaltergroup.com/blog</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Jan 2012 15:00:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Upcoming Supreme Court Decision: More Corporate Freedom of Speech?</title>
		<link>http://showaltergroup.com/blog/2009/12/16/upcoming-supreme-court-decision-more-corporate-freedom-of-speech/</link>
		<comments>http://showaltergroup.com/blog/2009/12/16/upcoming-supreme-court-decision-more-corporate-freedom-of-speech/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Dec 2009 12:00:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Amy Showalter</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Political Action Committees]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[freedom of speech]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://showaltergroup.com/blog/?p=394</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Straight from our I2M 201O faculty member, Brett Kappell of Arent Fox, his take on the upcoming Citizens United case before the Supreme Court and what it may mean for corporate political decisions.

The <span style="text-decoration: underline;">Citizens United</span> decision, assuming it ever comes down, could indeed have a profound impact on corporate government relations program.  If the Supreme Court were to overturn <span style="text-decoration: underline;">Austin</span>, both corporations and unions would be able to use money in their general treasury funds to run ads expressly advocating the election or defeat of specific candidates for federal office.  At least three members of the Court have already expressed the view that the restrictions on corporate express advocacy are unconstitutional and Chief Justice...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://showaltergroup.com/blog/2009/12/16/upcoming-supreme-court-decision-more-corporate-freedom-of-speech/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

