<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title> &#187; survey results</title>
	<atom:link href="http://showaltergroup.com/blog/tag/survey-results/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://showaltergroup.com/blog</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Jan 2012 15:00:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>More I2M Survey Results</title>
		<link>http://showaltergroup.com/blog/2010/10/27/more-2008-i2m-survey-results/</link>
		<comments>http://showaltergroup.com/blog/2010/10/27/more-2008-i2m-survey-results/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Oct 2010 14:59:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Amy Showalter</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Innovate to Motivate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Political Action Committees]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[survey results]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://showaltergroup.com/blog/?p=221</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Here are more results from our Innovate to Motivate® Success Survey. These results focus on PAC fundraising techniques and metrics.

One of the hallmarks of I2M is that we go beyond what is being discussed and commonly known to “drill down” and reveal patterns and data that can help us pursue political involvement excellence. I think you’ll find these results indicative of that philosophy.

<strong>Effective PAC Fundraising Techniques vs. Frequently Used Techniques</strong>

We asked our community two PAC fundraising questions:
<ol>
	<li>Which fundraising techniques are most effective?</li>
	<li>Which do they most frequently use? (percentages may total more than 100% due to respondents citing multiple techniques)</li>
</ol>
<span style="text-decoration: underline;">Most effective PAC fundraising techniques:</span>
<ol>
	<li>Peer to peer (one on one asks, small group meetings, personal phone calls, etc.) - 69%</li>
	<li>Special...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://showaltergroup.com/blog/2010/10/27/more-2008-i2m-survey-results/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>2008 I2M Survey Results</title>
		<link>http://showaltergroup.com/blog/2010/03/03/2008-i2m-survey-results/</link>
		<comments>http://showaltergroup.com/blog/2010/03/03/2008-i2m-survey-results/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Mar 2010 14:00:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Amy Showalter</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Government Relations Excellence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Innovate to Motivate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Research Commentary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[survey results]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://showaltergroup.com/blog/?p=223</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This survey is different from typical benchmarking surveys, as it goes several steps beyond the numbers to find out why certain political involvement outcomes are or are not prevalent.

Since the survey questions were largely open-ended, there is a lot of “word-crunching” to do, and we are thus releasing the results in phases, along with, where warranted, my commentary and “reality check” advice at the conclusion of each finding.

So, let’s get to the top of it!

<strong>Political Involvement Culture (“PIC”) Is Generally Strong</strong>

An organizational culture that is conducive to political involvement (PAC, grassroots, &#38; lobbying) makes our lives easier, right? I look at it like this: values drive attitudes, attitudes drive behavior, and behavior drives culture. Each is dependent on the other.

We...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://showaltergroup.com/blog/2010/03/03/2008-i2m-survey-results/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>New I2M Survey Results! We Reveal Best Practices of Experienced Grassroots and PAC Professionals</title>
		<link>http://showaltergroup.com/blog/2010/01/20/new-i2m-survey-results/</link>
		<comments>http://showaltergroup.com/blog/2010/01/20/new-i2m-survey-results/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jan 2010 14:02:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Amy Showalter</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Innovate to Motivate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[I2M]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[survey results]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://showaltergroup.com/blog/?p=450</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In 2007, we conducted research (“Winning Hearts and Minds 2007”) with hundreds of political involvement professionals to find out their challenges and success patterns. It’s  time to find out what has changed since then, and our results from “Winning Hearts and Minds 2009” will be a workstorm at I2M 2010.

This isn’t a just data dump -  I will share with you how to immediately apply the findings to your daily job.

We have segmented results among veteran political involvement professionals ( as well  as by corporate and association results) and those new to the profession, so you’ll know exactly what the experienced pro’s do and how they advance their programs.

<span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>You’ll learn:</strong></span>

Who they envy for their PAC,...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://showaltergroup.com/blog/2010/01/20/new-i2m-survey-results/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

